Environmental Health - Toxic Substances Hydrology Program

EH Science Feature Email Signup

U.S. Geological Survey Develops Approach to Assess Baseline Chemical and Radiological Conditions Prior to Uranium Mining near Grand Canyon National Park

Frequently Asked Questions

USGS Scientists Collecting Soil Samples at a Mine
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists collecting soil samples on the Canyon Mine property, Arizona. The mine's headframe and mine workshop are visible in the background. Photo Credit: Katie Walton-Day, USGS.

1. What is the most important thing people should know about this study?

This study provides robust data describing baseline geochemical and radiological conditions around and within the Canyon Mine.

2. Why is this important? How will your findings be used?

These data provide a benchmark against which to measure changes that might occur during future mining activity. We demonstrate application of sampling and statistical techniques that can be repeated in the future to help assess these changes in a defensible manner.

3. Do your findings indicate there is any threat to human health?

While resource extraction has not begun at this mine there has been premining construction activity to prepare the site. Preliminary results indicate there has not been mobilization of any contaminants from the ore body to the surface environment, nor from the mine site to the surrounding environment.

4. What kind of samples did you take?

We collected soil samples and stream sediment samples (in dry streams) for laboratory analysis of chemical and radiological contaminants. We also collected field measurements of gamma radiation at the ground surface.

5. What contaminants did you look for?

The report discusses results primarily for geogenic contaminants that could be associated with the geological formations present and underlying uranium ore including arsenic, cobalt, chromium, copper, molybdenum, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc.

6. Is the mine operational?

In preparation for resource extraction the mine is deepening the main shaft down to the depth of ore. But, ore is not yet being mined and brought to the surface.

7. If this area is within the 2012 withdrawal, why is the mine still there?

The 2012 withdrawal exempted mines with valid and existing rights. This mine was permitted for operations before the 2012 withdrawal and is therefore allowed to continue to operate.

8. Was there anything surprising about your findings?

Not really. A few geogenic contaminants such as arsenic, molybdenum, uranium, and vanadium were present within the mine-property perimeter in concentrations that were higher than we expected based on general soil chemistry of the area but at this time we are not alarmed. Our subsequent research will follow this result closely and determine the sources of the contaminants, their environmental exposure pathways to humans and biota that might be associated with resource extraction as the mine becomes fully operational.

9. Why are you studying this area?

The Canyon Mine is being studied by the USGS as part of our 15-year science plan to better understand the potential human and ecological exposures to contaminants associated with uranium mining throughout the Grand Canyon Region. This plan, which supports the science needed to inform decisions related to the withdrawal, includes studying soils, biota, and dust at mine sites before, during, and after mining to help understand how mining may introduce elements associated with the uranium ore into the surface ecosystem. See Department of Interior Press Release: Secretary Salazar Announces Decision to Withdraw Public Lands near Grand Canyon from New Mining Claims.

10. What's next?

We are working to evaluate other data that were collected at the Canyon Mine to form a complete picture of pre-mining conditions at the mine in soils, dust, water, and biota. If the Canyon Mine goes into production during the time we are conducting the rest of the 15-year Science plan, we will re-sample to learn how mining and reclamation at the site might affect environmental pathways of exposure to uranium and associated elements in soils, dust, and biota in the area. In addition, we are evaluating data collected at nearby active mines to compare with data collected at the Canyon Mine. All of this work is being conducted in collaboration with biologists who are assessing exposures, uptake, and effects of contaminants in biota.


Naftz, D., and Walton-Day, K., 2016, Establishing a pre-mining geochemical baseline at a uranium mine near Grand Canyon National Park, USA: Geoderma Regional, v. 7, no. 1, p. 76-92, doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.01.004.

Hinck, J.E., Linder, G., Darrah, A.J., Drost, C.A., Duniway, M.C., Johnson, M.J., Mendez-Harclerode, F.M., Nowak, E.M., Valdez, E.W., Wolff, S., and van Riper Iii, C., 2014, Exposure pathways and biological receptors--Baseline data for the Canyon Uranium Mine, Coconino County, Arizona: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, v. 5, no. 2, p. 422-440, doi:10.3996/052014-JFWM-039.

More Information

Related Science Features

Related Publications

Campbell, K.M., Gallegos, T.J., and Landa, E.R., 2014, Biogeochemical aspects of uranium mineralization, mining, milling, and remediation: Applied Geochemistry, v. 57, p. 206-235, doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.07.022.

Gallegos, T.J., Campbell, K.M., Zielinski, R.A., Reimus, P.W., Clay, J.T., Janot, N., J. R. Bargar, and Benzel, W.M., 2015, Persistent U(IV) and U(VI) following in-situ recovery (ISR) mining of a sandstone uranium deposit, Wyoming, USA: Applied Geochemistry, v. 63, p. 222-234, doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.08.017.

Gallegos, T.J., Fuller, C.C., Webb, S.M., and Betterton, W., 2013, Uranium(VI) interactions with mackinawite in the presence and absence of bicarbonate and oxygen: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 47, no. 13, p. 7357-7364, doi:10.1021/es400450z.


More Science Features


USGS Home Water Land Resources Science Systems Ecosystems Energy and Minerals Environmental Health Hazards

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page URL: toxics.usgs.gov/highlights/faq/2016-03-03-uranium_baseline_data_faq.html
Page Content Contact Information: webmaster@toxics.usgs.gov
Page Last Modified: 27-Jun-2018 @ 07:15:35 PM EDT