USGS - science for a changing world

Environmental Health - Toxic Substances

Toxics Program Remediation Activities

Remediating Some of the World's Most Acidic Waters at the Iron Mountain Superfund Site-A Tough Challenge for Scientists

Type
  • Site Characterization
  • Feasibility Studies
Location Iron Mountain, Redding (Shasta County), CA
Partners
Technology
  • Acid Neutralization Treatment Plan (lime/sulfide High Density Sludge (HDS) treatment process)
  • Capping of Selected Areas
  • Surface-Water Diversions
  • Mine Shaft Plugging (proposed but not implemented)
Contaminants
  • Metals (cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, zinc, and iron)
  • Acidic Water
Description

USGS scientists and their partners are studying the environmental impact of copper mining at Iron Mountain, California, in conjunction with stakeholders faced with cleaning up the site. Iron Mountain is a massive sulfide ore deposit that has been extensively mined for valuable metals, but has more recently earned the reputation as the one of the Nation's largest point sources of extremely acidic mine drainage containing large amounts of toxic metals. The total concentration of metals has been reported as high as 200 grams per liter. Iron Mountain has been a Superfund site since 1983, and is home of the world's most acidic water (negative 3.6 pH). In a word, remediating the extensive mines in a mountain of rock with almost no acid neutralization capacity is daunting. The scientists have conducted a variety of studies in direct support of the federal and state agency plans for remediation of the site. They include:

  • Mine Shaft Plugging Assessment - Geochemical characterization of Iron Mountain and geochemical modeling studies predicted that if the mine portals were plugged, a pool of water would develop with extremely acidic pH (near 1) and high metal concentrations (grams of dissolved metals per liter). The flooded mine pool would have a volume of about 600,000 cubic meters and would present a high risk to the environment and to the local community because of the potential of catastrophic plug failures, faulty plug seals releasing mine water, and acid seeps developing in other locations. Based on this information plugging of the mine was dropped from consideration.
  • Characterization and Assessment Studies - USGS scientists and their partners have conducted a variety of geochemical and mineralogical characterization studies to determine the acid-generating potential of the mine sites, estimate the pre-mining water quality, and determine the loads of metals discharging from the mine and transported down the several creeks in the area as well as the Sacramento River. They also developed methods to measure the extremely low pH of the water in this harsh environment. This information has been used to design the capacity of water treatment plants and the scope of other remediation systems at the site.
  • Sediment Characterization Studies - Metal-contaminated sediments precipitated from the mine drainage have accumulated in the Spring Creek Reservoir and the Keswick Reservoir on the Sacramento River. USGS scientists and their partners participated in EPA's Remedial Investigation by assessing the geochemistry, toxicity, and sorption properties of the sediments in the two reservoirs. Their studies showed the unexpected result that reduced iron in pore waters caused much of the toxicity in the sediments. This new information can be used to develop better mining regulations and to help resource managers restore watersheds impacted by mining. The current focus of their research is on the geochemistry, toxicity, and sorption of metals in sediments formed by the neutralization of acid mine waters that flow into the reservoirs.
More Information
Contact
  • Kirk Nordstrom, USGS, National Research Program, Denver, Colorado,
  • Charles Alpers, USGS, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, California,
Publications
Nordstrom, D.K. and Alpers, C.N., 1999,
Negative pH, efflorescent mineralogy, and consequences for environmental restoration at the Iron Mountain Superfund site, California: Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, v. 96, p. 3455-3462.
Nordstrom, D.K., Alpers, C.N., Ptacek, C.J., and Blowes, D.W., 2000,
Negative pH and extremely acidic mine waters at Iron Mountain Mine, California: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 34, no. 2, p. 254-258.
Nordstrom, D.K., Alpers, C.N., Coston, J.A., Taylor, H.E., McCleskey, R.B., Ball, J.W., Ogle, S.A., Cotsifas, J.S., and Davis, J.A., 1999,
Geochemistry, toxicity, and sorption properties of contaminated sediments and pore waters from two reservoirs receiving acid mine drainage, in Morganwalp, D.W., and Buxton, H.T., eds., U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program--Proceedings of the Technical Meeting, Charleston, South Carolina, March 8-12, 1999--Volume 1 of 3--Contamination from Hardrock Mining: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018A, p. 289-296.
Robbins, E.I., Rodgers, T.M., Alpers, C.N., and Nordstrom, D.K., 2000,
Ecogeochemistry of the subsurface food web at pH 0-2.5 in Iron Mountain, California, USA: Hydrobiologia, v. 433, no. 1-3, p. 15-23.
Links

USGS Acid Mine Drainage Remediation Projects

Back to Toxics Program Remediation Activities Index

USGS Home Water Climate Change Science Systems Ecosystems Energy and Minerals Environmental Health Hazards

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://toxics.usgs.gov/topics/rem_act/iron_mountain.html
Page Contact Information:
Page Last Modified: Tuesday, 06-May-2014 14:37:04 EDT