USGS - science for a changing world

Environmental Health - Toxic Substances

Science Features
EH Science Feature Email Signup

USGS Develops Geophysical Methods to Improve Remediation Monitoring and Site Characterization

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists continue to develop and adapt new geophysical technologies and data analysis methods for monitoring the performance of remediation systems and for the characterization of contaminated sites. Geophysical monitoring methods are particularly adept at measuring changes in subsurface properties that relate to the presence of water, tracers, contaminants, and injected fluids (steam, bacterial growth promoters, chemical oxidants, ...). This makes the methods ideally suited to monitor many engineered remediation systems that inject fluids into the subsurface to enhance the biodegradation of contaminants. High-resolution geophysical data provide information that supplements conventional hydrologic tests and water-quality sampling. These non invasive geophysical methods have the potential to provide more cost-effective and reliable information for performance monitoring of remediation strategies and contaminated site characterization. Recent studies include the following four examples:

Tracer Test Monitoring at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts

USGS and Stanford University scientists used electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) – similar to medical CAT scan techniques – to monitor the subsurface movement of a saline tracer (sodium chloride – salt) in an unconsolidated sedimentary aquifer. Resulting time-lapse geophysical images identified flow paths of tracer transport in the aquifer, indicated contrasts representative of changes in tracer concentration in three dimensions (3-D) through time, and were useful in calibrating a ground-water flow computer model. The ERT results include sixty 3-D snapshots of tracer movement during a 20-day test. The combination of ERT imaging and conventional tracer tests provides a new methodology for understanding aquifer heterogeneity at the field scale.


More Information

Monitoring Biostimulation Remediation at the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant (NIROP), Fridley, Minnesota

USGS scientists used time-lapse borehole radar tomography to monitor a field-scale bioremediation pilot project conducted by the U.S. Navy. A vegetable-oil emulsion was injected to stimulate microbial degradation in areas contaminated by chlorinated hydrocarbons (including trichloroethylene (TCE) and dichloroethylene (DCE)). The radar tomography delineated the spatial distribution and between-well saturation of the vegetable-oil emulsion, and indicated the extent of ground water with altered chemistry. The geophysical monitoring results indicated that the vegetable-oil biostimulant remained close to the three injection wells; however, downgradient total dissolved solids increased after injection, consistent with microbial stimulation and chlorinated hydrocarbon degradation.

References More Information

Steam-Enhanced Remediation Monitoring at the Former Loring Air Force Base, Limestone, Maine

The USGS used borehole radar tomography and reflection techniques to monitor steam-enhanced remediation of a fractured limestone aquifer contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons. The borehole radar results were used to estimate the extent and degree of steam invasion within the aquifer in the vicinity of the radar monitoring wells.


Grégoire, C., Lane, J.W. Jr., and Joesten, P.K., 2005, Steam injection pilot study in a contaminated fractured limestone (Maine, USA)—Modeling and analysis of borehole radar reflection data, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar, Delft, The Netherlands, May 2-4, 2005.

More Information

Animation of the computed electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) results
Animation of the computed electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) results for the 20-day saline tracer test at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The tomograms show the percent change in subsurface electrical resistivity after injection of a saline tracer. Blue regions indicate a zone of decreased resistivity, representing the location of the saline tracer
(Click on Image to start animation 850K )


Setup for the electrical resistivity tomography
Setup for the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) that USGS scientists used to monitor the injection of a saline tracer at the Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The yellow cables are ERT cables. Metal pipes indicate location of sampling sites. Boreholes are encased in white PVC pipes


Borehole radar slowness-difference tomogram
Borehole radar slowness-difference tomogram between a biostimulant injection well and a downgradient monitoring well, Anoka County Riverfront Park, Fridley, Minnesota. The blue region (increased radar velocity) delineates the region containing the vegetable-oil biostimulant (after Lane and others, 2004).
(Larger Version)


Borehole radar being set up at the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordinance Plant, Fridley, MN, site
Borehole radar being set up at the Naval Industrial Reserve Ordinance Plant (NIROP), Fridley, Minnesota, field site
(Larger Version)


Borehole radar logging at the former Loring Air Force Base, Limestone, Maine
Borehole radar logging at the former Loring Air Force Base, Limestone, Maine
(Larger Version)


USGS scientist processing preliminary borehole radar data
USGS scientist processing preliminary borehole radar data inside a trailer used to house borehole radar equipment. White pipes on the left are for antenna storage
(Larger Version)

Linking Geophysics and Hydrologic Characterization

Geophysical tomography methods are used increasingly to help estimate hydrologic properties in sedimentary and fractured-rock aquifers. In an effort to strengthen the link between geophysical and hydrogeologic characterization, USGS scientists investigated the effect of measurement resolution on the ability to use geophysical tomograms to estimate hydrologic parameters (for example, porosity, solute concentration, water content). Using a new modeling approach, it is possible to predict and quantify the loss of information (blurring and streaking) in tomography. ERT performs well near the boreholes, but produces smoothed out estimates in the interwell region; in contrast, radar performs well in the middle of the tomogram but poorly at the boreholes. Thus, ERT and radar can provide complementary information about hydrologic properties between boreholes.

References More Information General Information on Geophysical Methods Research

Related Science Features

More Science Features

USGS Home Water Climate Change Science Systems Ecosystems Energy and Minerals Environmental Health Hazards

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
Page Contact Information:
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 14-Apr-2016 15:30:00 EDT

Created on October 26, 2005